What is the difference between "User Acceptance Testing" and "Acceptance Testing"? - user acceptance test plan
I am currently recruiting for a post, and I want someone who has been with UAT SAP.
I know that a study of "acceptance" and "black box" testing "are the same - but my question is how various" acceptance testing "of the" ATU "... If you are not very different, as someone who" black box test had "and has, together with SAP to work?
Thursday, January 21, 2010
User Acceptance Test Plan What Is The Difference Between "User Acceptance Testing" And "Acceptance Testing"?
2 comments:
UAT or User Acceptance Testing is common for customers to domestic companies. This is not the same as black box testing.
There he worked for the last time we had the server DEV (development) QA (quality assurance) that the black box testing, UAT (User Acceptance Testing), carried out in which internal users can have the newest and PROD (production test)
So I held three classes of codes for access to products, and as far as possible, were the quality of UAT and PROD environments except for software testing identical. Quality control tested, a number of changes, but when I'm at the TSU, a product was tested at a time and others not under control until the subject had been rejected and the changes were reversed or encouraged and part of the PROD.
So yes, the ATU is usually a little different as a black-box testing "of the broader quality control.
They are a contact of the human conscience, go to this length to do too well. Unfortunately, many software / IS / IT departments do not know which will create a kind of funnel for the writing of job descriptions andask for things not needed, or you can learn in a few days. The result is that many good people have gone to someone who is exactly the requirements before you find the phone's display.
The first answer is very good, but not, in my opinion, only differences. I expect a person for acceptance testing hired to (not in a position to read the specifications for the software, but it worked to undergo - as black box) and a staged procedure in order to determine if there is a lack of harmony with steps. In a higher position, that person can create or modify the technical specifications.
A person hired to acceptance, which I think should have the "clients" that are not internal, including testing, it has to an inspector or an observer of the users testing the software and be able to print detailed reports or check your notes with them, or write what they observed. Users with earlier versions of the software must become familiar.
The person must be a person or a related procedure in detail, the TSU must be a people person with social skills and observation. In my opinion, working with a variety of software, including what I wrote outside the structures of large companies.
Post a Comment